First of all, an apology to anyone who may have expected to receive this mailing yesterday! My wife and I are currently visiting dear friends south of Paris and, last evening, we got into a deep discussion on the thorny topic of divorce and remarriage! I shall endeavour to ensure that the next post - on the third Sunday of the month, will be sent out on time!
Last time, we looked at the parable of the Prodigal Son (or
the Loving Father), as one of the best-known of the stories that Jesus of
Nazareth told.
Another of those parables that is well-known even by those
who make no claim to be followers of Jesus, is the parable of the Good
Samaritan (Luke 10). Indeed, this
parable has, at least in its name, become part and parcel of everyday
language. How often have you heard
someone say (or maybe even said yourself) that, in a particular situation,
“[Name] was a good Samaritan.” What is
usually meant is that the person helped out in what may even have been a rather
insignificant way.
However, the parable goes much more deeply than that!
The man who was travelling down the tortuous mountain road
from Jerusalem to Jericho, was a Jew.
After he had been attacked, robbed, stripped, and left for dead, the
first person to come along the road was a Jewish priest. It would appear that he was travelling up the
road towards Jerusalem, presumably to take up his duties in the Temple. He saw the man, but “passed by on the other
side” because, if he had touched a dead body, he would have been barred from
the Temple service. Then came a Levite –
another Temple worker – and, for the same reason, he too “passed by on the
other side”.
The poor man, who may have managed, through barely-opened
eyelids, to see these fellow-Jews; these ‘pillars of society’; these religious personages;
pass by, must have been in deep despair.
Suddenly, he heard the clip-clop of a donkey. He peered through his bruised eyes and, to
his horror, saw a Samaritan!
Now, to understand his reaction, we must realise that Jews
and Samaritans, in that culture, hated each other with a passion that would
have made the feelings of certain football club supporters towards one another
seem like genuine fondness by comparison!
What would this man do? Would he
take advantage of the situation, and ‘kick the man while he was down’? How amazed the victim would have been to be
so gently, and carefully, tended to by this member of a hated ethnicity! Not only that, but when they reached the next
inn, the Samaritan paid for him to stay there until he had recovered – and
assured the innkeeper that if the injured man needed to stay longer than had been paid for,
he would settle the account on his next trip!
By the way, he must have had a good reputation to be thus trusted!
Of course, this is what Jesus had taught in what we usually refer to as "the Sermon on the Mount" (Matt. 5-7) where we read: «You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbour and hate your enemy.' But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you salute only your brethren, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? You, therefore, must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.» (Matt 5:43-48).
The priest and the Levite allowed duty, even "religious" duty, to get in the way of helping a fellow-man. The Samaritan helped his fellow-man, even ‘though it meant overcoming ethnic hatred.
I wonder what you or I would have done – or would do – in a
similar situation.
It’s a thought!
No comments:
Post a Comment